<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Ruin Your Advert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.successtrackonline.com/2009/09/01/how-to-ruin-your-advert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.successtrackonline.com/2009/09/01/how-to-ruin-your-advert/</link>
	<description>Special FREE one-day seminar for ambitious business owners only! Discover 7 Sales and Marketing Secrets an MBA won\&#039;t teach you! Register now by calling 0208 788 9064</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:12:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Megan Dovey</title>
		<link>http://www.successtrackonline.com/2009/09/01/how-to-ruin-your-advert/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Dovey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.successtrackonline.com/?p=1913#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Thank you, thank you at last some one who as picked up on what I&#039;ve been saying for years. 

I receive e-mails all the time that I can&#039;t read, the reason is I have dyslexic.
They come in too small typeface, fonts I can&#039;t see, coloured text on solid background that don&#039;t work for me, and the post is the same a lot of letters come in times front, if its under 20 I can&#039;t read it,
I find verdana, bitstream, vera and sans best for me, I don&#039;t have to change anything to read it but lots of others come in and the first thing I have to do is change the font and or size that&#039;s if I can if not I have to wait and ask my husband to read it out for me.
Barclay&#039;s bank is a good one, they just change their site now they print on screen in pale blue I can&#039;t see it, so to bank on line I need someone to read the boxes for me, not a good thing, I&#039;ve reported it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, thank you at last some one who as picked up on what I&#8217;ve been saying for years. </p>
<p>I receive e-mails all the time that I can&#8217;t read, the reason is I have dyslexic.<br />
They come in too small typeface, fonts I can&#8217;t see, coloured text on solid background that don&#8217;t work for me, and the post is the same a lot of letters come in times front, if its under 20 I can&#8217;t read it,<br />
I find verdana, bitstream, vera and sans best for me, I don&#8217;t have to change anything to read it but lots of others come in and the first thing I have to do is change the font and or size that&#8217;s if I can if not I have to wait and ask my husband to read it out for me.<br />
Barclay&#8217;s bank is a good one, they just change their site now they print on screen in pale blue I can&#8217;t see it, so to bank on line I need someone to read the boxes for me, not a good thing, I&#8217;ve reported it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.successtrackonline.com/2009/09/01/how-to-ruin-your-advert/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.successtrackonline.com/?p=1913#comment-116</guid>
		<description>This particular bulletin really stirred up a hornet&#039;s nest! 

We had people calling into the office pointing out that the email itself was in a sans serif font and surely a contradiction to what the article was about.

Some were outraged over this apparent contradiction!

It brings up the interesting point of readability on a computer screen rather than on a piece of paper.

Our article was about ensuring the readability of your message when communicating in print - and as has been pointed out, a different set of rules apply to on screen readability.

The bottom line is - some fonts are easier to read than others and your target market can also influence the size of the font (for example, an older target market might appreciate a larger font etc).

At the end of the day, if your message can&#039;t be read easily, then your chances of selling to that person diminish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This particular bulletin really stirred up a hornet&#8217;s nest! </p>
<p>We had people calling into the office pointing out that the email itself was in a sans serif font and surely a contradiction to what the article was about.</p>
<p>Some were outraged over this apparent contradiction!</p>
<p>It brings up the interesting point of readability on a computer screen rather than on a piece of paper.</p>
<p>Our article was about ensuring the readability of your message when communicating in print &#8211; and as has been pointed out, a different set of rules apply to on screen readability.</p>
<p>The bottom line is &#8211; some fonts are easier to read than others and your target market can also influence the size of the font (for example, an older target market might appreciate a larger font etc).</p>
<p>At the end of the day, if your message can&#8217;t be read easily, then your chances of selling to that person diminish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.successtrackonline.com/2009/09/01/how-to-ruin-your-advert/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.successtrackonline.com/?p=1913#comment-115</guid>
		<description>All good advice and it is also worth remembering to stick to one type face and don&#039;t use a wide variety of colours.  Both these errors make your communication look messy and really amateur</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All good advice and it is also worth remembering to stick to one type face and don&#8217;t use a wide variety of colours.  Both these errors make your communication look messy and really amateur</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Richards</title>
		<link>http://www.successtrackonline.com/2009/09/01/how-to-ruin-your-advert/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>John Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.successtrackonline.com/?p=1913#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I agree with some of the things Michael Masterson recommends and disagree with others.

He&#039;s right about reverse type but wrong about sans serif fonts. The easiest fonts to read resemble your own handwriting, unsurprisingly. Which means Comic sans and, at a pinch arial like you use on this website (there are others). 

You might find Type and Layout by C Wheildon (Strathmore Press) useful. 

There are also best places to put pictures on a page.

From my own MA(Ed) dissertation you should avoid trying to get your message across using only Labelled and Annotated Illustrations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with some of the things Michael Masterson recommends and disagree with others.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s right about reverse type but wrong about sans serif fonts. The easiest fonts to read resemble your own handwriting, unsurprisingly. Which means Comic sans and, at a pinch arial like you use on this website (there are others). </p>
<p>You might find Type and Layout by C Wheildon (Strathmore Press) useful. </p>
<p>There are also best places to put pictures on a page.</p>
<p>From my own MA(Ed) dissertation you should avoid trying to get your message across using only Labelled and Annotated Illustrations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
